Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with ?α?α = .05 

 

Problem solving template 

n = 

df = 

MD= 

μD = 

s2 = 

SM D= 

  1. State the hypothesis s and select alpha (consider one tailed or two tailed) Sate hypothesis in words: 

Null stated in words: 

Alternative stated in words: 

State hypothesis in symbols: Hₒ:  

State alternative in symbols: Hₗ: 

  1. Locate critical region for stated alpha 
  2. Compute test statistic (Repeated measure t-score) 

Variance for D scores: S2 

Estimated standard error SMD : 

Computed repeated measure t statistic: 

  1. Make a decision about the null hypothesis and state a conclusion. 

Decision: Are you going to reject the null or fail to reject the null Conclusion: ex. The independent variable did or did not have a significant effect Remember: if you reject, there was significance

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of MD = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with αα = .05 

Please answer the following in parenthesis.  (null in word, alternative in words, null in symbols, alternative in symbols, critical region t,  df,  all steps in the analysis computing your repeated measure computed t, make a decision, and give a conclusion)

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Will there be a difference between the two conditions? Use a two-tailed test with α = .01    Show all the steps.

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with α = .05 

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Will there be a difference between the two conditions? Use a two-tailed test with α = .01    Show all the steps.

Please answer the following in the parenthesis. (null in word, alternative in words, null in symbols, alternative in symbols, critical region t,  df,  all steps in the analysis computing your repeated measure computed t, make a decision, and give a conclusion.)

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Will there be a difference between the two conditions? Use a two-tailed test with α= .01 Show all the steps.

n =

df =

MD=

μD =

s2 =

SD=

State the hypothesis s and select alpha (consider one tailed or two tailed):

Locate critical region for stated alpha:

Compute test statistic (Repeated measure t-score):

Variance  for D scores: S2:

Estimated standard error SMD:

Computed repeated measure t statistic:

Decision:

Conclusion:

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Will there be a difference between the two conditions? Use a two-tailed test with ?α?α = .01    Show all the steps.

 

Problem solving template 

n = 

df = 

MD= 

μD = 

s2 = 

SM D= 

  1. State the hypothesis s and select alpha (consider one tailed or two tailed) Sate hypothesis in words: 

Null stated in words: 

Alternative stated in words: 

State hypothesis in symbols: Hₒ:  

State alternative in symbols: Hₗ: 

  1. Locate critical region for stated alpha 
  2. Compute test statistic (Repeated measure t-score) 

Variance for D scores: S2 

Estimated standard error SMD : 

Computed repeated measure t statistic: 

  1. Make a decision about the null hypothesis and state a conclusion. 

Decision: Are you going to reject the null or fail to reject the null Conclusion: ex. The independent variable did or did not have a significant effect Remember: if you reject, there was significance

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with α= .05 

n =

df =

MD=

μD =

s2 =

SD=

State the hypothesis s and select alpha (consider one tailed or two tailed):

Locate critical region for stated alpha:

Compute test statistic (Repeated measure t-score):

Variance  for D scores: S2:

Estimated standard error SMD:

Computed repeated measure t statistic:

Decision:

Conclusion:

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Will there be a difference between the two conditions? Use a two-tailed test with α = .01    Show all the steps.

Problem solving template

n =

df =

MD=

μD =

s2 =

SM D=

1. State the hypothesis s and select alpha (consider one tailed or two tailed)

Sate hypothesis in words:

            Null stated in words:

            Alternative stated in words:

State hypothesis in symbols: Hₒ:

State alternative in symbols: H(square):

2. Locate critical region for stated alpha

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with α = .05 

 

Problem solving template

  1. Compute test statistic (Repeated measure t-score)

            Variance  for D scores: S2

                        Estimated standard error SMD  :

                        Computed repeated measure t statistic:

 

2. Make a decision about the null hypothesis and state a conclusion.

      Decision: Are you going to reject the null or fail to reject the null

      Conclusion:  ex. The independent variable did or did not have a significant effect

      Remember: if you reject, there was significance

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Will there be a difference between the two conditions? Use a two-tailed test with α = .01    Show all the steps.

Problem solving template

  1. Compute test statistic (Repeated measure t-score)

            Variance  for D scores: S2

                        Estimated standard error SMD  :

                        Computed repeated measure t statistic:

 

2. Make a decision about the null hypothesis and state a conclusion.

 

      Decision: Are you going to reject the null or fail to reject the null

      Conclusion:  ex. The independent variable did or did not have a significant effect

      Remember: if you reject, there was significance

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with α= .05 

n =

df =

MD=

μD =

s2 =

SD=

State the hypothesis s and select alpha (consider one tailed or two tailed):

Locate critical region for stated alpha:

Compute test statistic (Repeated measure t-score):

Variance  for D scores: S2:

Estimated standard error SMD:

Computed repeated measure t statistic:

Decision:

Conclusion:

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with α = .05 

Problem solving template

n =

df =

MD=

μD =

s2 =

SM D=

  1. State the hypothesis s and select alpha (consider one tailed or two tailed)

Sate hypothesis in words:

            Null stated in words:

            Alternative stated in words:

State hypothesis in symbols: Hₒ:

State alternative in symbols: H(square):

2. Locate critical region for stated alpha

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown).  A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of n = 25 adults between the ages 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained by frowning. On average, the cartoons were rated funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of M D = 1.6 with SS = 150.

In this problem, you do not have to calculate SS or the mean difference which is already provided. 

Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling?  Use a one-tailed test with α = .05 

Please answer the question using all of the steps: null in word, alternative in words, null in symbols, alternative in symbols, critical region t,  df,  all steps in the analysis computing your repeated measure computed t, make a decision, and give a conclusion. 

Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1

  1. Strack, Martin, and Stepper (1988) reported that people rate cartoons as funnier when holding a pen in their teeth (which forced them to smile) than when holding a pen in their lips (which forced them to frown). A researcher attempted to replicate this result using a sample of adults between the ages of 40 and 45. For each person, the researcher recorded the difference between the rating obtained while smiling and the rating obtained while frowning. On average the cartoons were rated as funnier when the participants were smiling, with an average difference of  with .
    1. Do the data indicate that the cartoons are rated significantly funnier when the participants are smiling? Use a one-tailed test with .
    2. Compute to measure the size of the treatment effect.
    3. Write a sentence describing the outcome of the hypothesis test and the measure of effect size as it would appear in a research report.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more